Infographic: The London Market Claims Ecosystem

The London Market Claims Ecosystem

An infographic mapping the intricate web of claims interconnections

The Core Participants & Their Roles

The London Market claims process is a collaborative effort, orchestrated by several key entities, each with distinct responsibilities. Understanding these roles is crucial to navigating the claims journey. This diagram illustrates the primary participants and their fundamental interactions.

Insurance Broker
Represents the policyholder. Manages First Notification of Loss (FNOL) submission, typically via ECF. Advocates for the client throughout the claims process, liaising with insurers, negotiating settlements, and providing claims strategy advice. Ensures clear communication.
Lead Syndicate / Managing Agent (MA)
The primary risk carrier (or their representative) for a given policy. Sets the claims strategy, manages ECF responses, and is the key decision-maker. Appoints and manages experts (Loss Adjusters, Legal Firms). Oversees any delegated claims authority and plays a central role in the Lloyd’s Claims Scheme and SCAP for agreement with following market.
MGA / Coverholder
Authorized by a Managing Agent (via a Binding Authority) to underwrite risks and often to handle claims on behalf of syndicates. May have specific Line of Business expertise. Collects premiums and manages claims bordereaux reporting to the MA. Can have delegated claims settlement authority up to agreed limits.
Third-Party Administrator (TPA)
An outsourced provider managing claims handling services for insurers or MGAs. Handles claims from FNOL to settlement for specific portfolios or lines of business, operating under delegated authority and strict Service Level Agreements (SLAs). Often utilized for volume claims or specialized expertise.
Loss Adjuster
An independent expert appointed by insurers (or their delegates) to investigate the cause, nature, and extent of a loss. Assesses damage, evaluates the financial quantum of the claim, interprets policy conditions, and often negotiates settlement with the policyholder or their representatives. Provides detailed reports to the insurer.
Legal Firm
Provides specialist legal advice on policy coverage, liability, and quantum. Manages dispute resolution through litigation, arbitration, or mediation. Defends claims against policyholders or insurers. Investigates potential fraud and pursues recovery actions. Appointed by insurers, MGAs, TPAs, or directly by large policyholders.

The Core Claims Journey

A claim’s journey through the London Market follows a structured, technology-enabled path. While complex claims have many nuances, this flowchart illustrates the typical process for a subscription market risk, highlighting key systems and agreement protocols that ensure efficiency.

1. First Notification of Loss (FNOL)

Policyholder informs Broker, who submits the claim to the Lead Insurer via the Electronic Claim File (ECF) system.

2. Triage & Expert Appointment

Lead Insurer reviews the claim, assesses complexity, and appoints experts (Loss Adjusters, Lawyers, etc.) as needed.

3. Investigation & Quantum

Experts investigate the cause and value of the loss, reporting their findings back to the Insurer and Broker.

4. Claims Agreement Protocol

For subscription risks, agreement is streamlined. The Lloyd’s Claims Scheme or SCAP gives the Lead authority to agree the claim for following insurers.

5. Negotiation & Settlement

Broker negotiates the final settlement with the Lead Insurer on behalf of the policyholder.

6. Payment

Funds are collected from all participating insurers via central market systems (e.g., DXC) and paid to the Broker for transfer to the policyholder.

Claims Interconnections by Line of Business

The nature of the risk fundamentally shapes the claims process. Different lines of business place emphasis on different experts and interactions. Below is a comparison of how the claims ecosystem adapts to various specialty risks.

Commercial Property & BI

Claims are driven by physical damage. The process is dominated by on-site investigation to determine the cause and quantify the cost of reinstatement and lost income.

Key Players:

🕵️ 🧾 🤝 🏢

The Loss Adjuster’s report on damage and valuation is the central document driving the claim forward, especially for property damage. Forensic Accountants are vital for complex Business Interruption calculations.

Professional Indemnity (PI)

Claims arise from allegations of professional error or negligence. The process is typically litigation-driven, focusing on legal defense strategy, coverage analysis, and expert witness testimony from the outset.

Key Players:

⚖️ 🤝 🏢 🧑‍🏫

The immediate appointment of Legal Firms (Defense and Coverage Counsel) is the critical first step. Expert Witnesses specific to the profession involved are often crucial.

Marine (Hull & Cargo)

These claims are global, involving damage to vessels (Hull) or goods in transit (Cargo). Swift on-site assessment by technical experts (Surveyors) and understanding of maritime law are crucial.

Key Players:

🚢 ⚖️ 🛡️

Marine Surveyors provide initial damage assessments. Average Adjusters quantify complex claims like General Average. Maritime Lawyers and P&I Clubs handle liability aspects.

Cyber Risks

Cyber claims are a crisis response to events like data breaches or ransomware attacks. The focus is on immediate incident containment, forensic investigation, legal compliance, and managing reputational fallout.

Key Players:

💻 ⚖️ 📢 💰

The claim is a live incident response, managed by a panel of pre-approved specialists (Forensics, Breach Coach, PR, Negotiators) activated by the insurer, often coordinated by a TPA or specialized MGA.

Energy (Onshore/Offshore)

Energy claims often involve high-value, high-complexity events (e.g., damage to rigs, pipelines, refineries). They require deep engineering, environmental, and contractual expertise to analyze cause, control loss, and plan remediation.

Key Players:

⚙️ 🌍 ⚖️ 🕵️

Highly specialized engineering consultants and environmental experts are central. Specialist Loss Adjusters coordinate the multi-faceted investigation and quantification.

Reinsurance

“Insurance for insurers.” Claims are typically a B2B transaction based on the underlying claim paid by the ceding insurer. Data quality, accuracy of bordereaux, and treaty/facultative wording interpretation are paramount.

Key Players:

🏢 🤝 🏦 🧐

The claim is a data-driven process, relying on the quality of claims bordereaux from the Cedent. Reinsurers may conduct claims audits for large or unusual losses. The Reinsurance Broker facilitates communication and settlement.

Infographic based on Ether Introductions and the Deep Research report: “Interconnections for Claims in the London Market”.

This is a visual representation and does not constitute financial or legal advice. No SVG or Mermaid JS was used in the creation of this document.

Infographic: The London Market Claims Ecosystem

The London Market Claims Ecosystem

An infographic mapping the intricate web of claims interconnections

The Core Participants & Their Roles

The London Market claims process is a collaborative effort, orchestrated by several key entities, each with distinct responsibilities. Understanding these roles is crucial to navigating the claims journey. This diagram illustrates the primary participants and their fundamental interactions.

Insurance Broker
Represents the policyholder. Manages First Notification of Loss (FNOL) submission, typically via ECF. Advocates for the client throughout the claims process, liaising with insurers, negotiating settlements, and providing claims strategy advice. Ensures clear communication.
Lead Syndicate / Managing Agent (MA)
The primary risk carrier (or their representative) for a given policy. Sets the claims strategy, manages ECF responses, and is the key decision-maker. Appoints and manages experts (Loss Adjusters, Legal Firms). Oversees any delegated claims authority and plays a central role in the Lloyd’s Claims Scheme and SCAP for agreement with following market.
MGA / Coverholder
Authorized by a Managing Agent (via a Binding Authority) to underwrite risks and often to handle claims on behalf of syndicates. May have specific Line of Business expertise. Collects premiums and manages claims bordereaux reporting to the MA. Can have delegated claims settlement authority up to agreed limits.
Third-Party Administrator (TPA)
An outsourced provider managing claims handling services for insurers or MGAs. Handles claims from FNOL to settlement for specific portfolios or lines of business, operating under delegated authority and strict Service Level Agreements (SLAs). Often utilized for volume claims or specialized expertise.
Loss Adjuster
An independent expert appointed by insurers (or their delegates) to investigate the cause, nature, and extent of a loss. Assesses damage, evaluates the financial quantum of the claim, interprets policy conditions, and often negotiates settlement with the policyholder or their representatives. Provides detailed reports to the insurer.
Legal Firm
Provides specialist legal advice on policy coverage, liability, and quantum. Manages dispute resolution through litigation, arbitration, or mediation. Defends claims against policyholders or insurers. Investigates potential fraud and pursues recovery actions. Appointed by insurers, MGAs, TPAs, or directly by large policyholders.

The Core Claims Journey

A claim’s journey through the London Market follows a structured, technology-enabled path. While complex claims have many nuances, this flowchart illustrates the typical process for a subscription market risk, highlighting key systems and agreement protocols that ensure efficiency.

1. First Notification of Loss (FNOL)

Policyholder informs Broker, who submits the claim to the Lead Insurer via the Electronic Claim File (ECF) system.

2. Triage & Expert Appointment

Lead Insurer reviews the claim, assesses complexity, and appoints experts (Loss Adjusters, Lawyers, etc.) as needed.

3. Investigation & Quantum

Experts investigate the cause and value of the loss, reporting their findings back to the Insurer and Broker.

4. Claims Agreement Protocol

For subscription risks, agreement is streamlined. The Lloyd’s Claims Scheme or SCAP gives the Lead authority to agree the claim for following insurers.

5. Negotiation & Settlement

Broker negotiates the final settlement with the Lead Insurer on behalf of the policyholder.

6. Payment

Funds are collected from all participating insurers via central market systems (e.g., DXC) and paid to the Broker for transfer to the policyholder.

Claims Interconnections by Line of Business

The nature of the risk fundamentally shapes the claims process. Different lines of business place emphasis on different experts and interactions. Below is a comparison of how the claims ecosystem adapts to various specialty risks.

Commercial Property & BI

Claims are driven by physical damage. The process is dominated by on-site investigation to determine the cause and quantify the cost of reinstatement and lost income.

Key Players:

🕵️ 🧾 🤝 🏢

The Loss Adjuster’s report on damage and valuation is the central document driving the claim forward, especially for property damage. Forensic Accountants are vital for complex Business Interruption calculations.

Professional Indemnity (PI)

Claims arise from allegations of professional error or negligence. The process is typically litigation-driven, focusing on legal defense strategy, coverage analysis, and expert witness testimony from the outset.

Key Players:

⚖️ 🤝 🏢 🧑‍🏫

The immediate appointment of Legal Firms (Defense and Coverage Counsel) is the critical first step. Expert Witnesses specific to the profession involved are often crucial.

Marine (Hull & Cargo)

These claims are global, involving damage to vessels (Hull) or goods in transit (Cargo). Swift on-site assessment by technical experts (Surveyors) and understanding of maritime law are crucial.

Key Players:

🚢 ⚖️ 🛡️

Marine Surveyors provide initial damage assessments. Average Adjusters quantify complex claims like General Average. Maritime Lawyers and P&I Clubs handle liability aspects.

Cyber Risks

Cyber claims are a crisis response to events like data breaches or ransomware attacks. The focus is on immediate incident containment, forensic investigation, legal compliance, and managing reputational fallout.

Key Players:

💻 ⚖️ 📢 💰

The claim is a live incident response, managed by a panel of pre-approved specialists (Forensics, Breach Coach, PR, Negotiators) activated by the insurer, often coordinated by a TPA or specialized MGA.

Energy (Onshore/Offshore)

Energy claims often involve high-value, high-complexity events (e.g., damage to rigs, pipelines, refineries). They require deep engineering, environmental, and contractual expertise to analyze cause, control loss, and plan remediation.

Key Players:

⚙️ 🌍 ⚖️ 🕵️

Highly specialized engineering consultants and environmental experts are central. Specialist Loss Adjusters coordinate the multi-faceted investigation and quantification.

Reinsurance

“Insurance for insurers.” Claims are typically a B2B transaction based on the underlying claim paid by the ceding insurer. Data quality, accuracy of bordereaux, and treaty/facultative wording interpretation are paramount.

Key Players:

🏢 🤝 🏦 🧐

The claim is a data-driven process, relying on the quality of claims bordereaux from the Cedent. Reinsurers may conduct claims audits for large or unusual losses. The Reinsurance Broker facilitates communication and settlement.

Infographic based on Ether Introductions and the Deep Research report: “Interconnections for Claims in the London Market”.

This is a visual representation and does not constitute financial or legal advice. No SVG or Mermaid JS was used in the creation of this document.

UK Insurance Market: Trends & Consolidation

UK Insurance Market: Trends & Consolidation

An overview of key trends, market dynamics, and the transformative impact of consolidation and technology in the UK insurance sector. 2025 Analysis.

Market Overview & Key Metrics

The UK household insurance market demonstrates robust GWP growth, yet faces challenges from rising claims costs and consumer affordability. These core figures provide essential context for the sector’s current state and future trajectory.

£7.07B

UK Household Insurance GWP (2023)

£396

Avg. Home Insurance Price (Q2 2024)

16%

Avg. Payout Rise per Claim (Q2 2024)

Premium Increases (2023)

Insurers have responded to rising claims and inflation by increasing premium rates across different policy types.

Data illustrates the percentage increase in premiums for combined, buildings-only, and contents-only policies during 2023, reflecting the industry’s adjustment to cost pressures.

Consumer Insights & Challenges

Economic pressures are significantly influencing consumer behavior, leading to a notable protection gap and increased price sensitivity in the market.

Uninsured Households (2024)

A notable percentage of UK homes lack any form of home insurance, highlighting a critical protection gap that insurers and policymakers need to address.

Approximately 25% of UK households, equating to around 7 million homes, were uninsured in 2024.

17.9%

Policy Cancellations (2023)

Reflects consumers cancelling insurance, often due to the cost-of-living crisis.

64%

Shop Around at Renewal

Indicates high price sensitivity and proactive consumer behavior in seeking value.

The Consolidation Wave: An Interactive Timeline

Explore the major mergers and acquisitions that have shaped the UK insurance landscape. The timeline automatically scrolls, or you can drag it manually. Click on an event card for details.

1985

Event Details:

Key Players & Strategic Shifts

The UK insurance market features several dominant players. Their scale, often reflective of past and ongoing M&A, is illustrated by their significant Gross Written Premiums or relevant revenue figures.

Leading Insurers by Relevant GWP/Revenue (2024)

Figures represent group-level or specified segment premiums/revenue. Direct household GWP is often not separately disclosed, requiring inference from broader personal lines or general insurance data.

This chart showcases the scale of major insurers, highlighting their substantial market presence based on latest reported financials for relevant business segments.

Driving Forces of Change & Consolidation

Several interconnected factors are fueling the continuous evolution and consolidation within the UK insurance market. These drivers shape strategic decisions and the overall market structure.

Economies of Scale & Scope

Seeking cost reduction, better pricing power, and enhanced profitability through larger customer bases and diverse product offerings across various insurance lines.

Capital Efficiency

Optimizing balance sheets, freeing up capital, and meeting evolving solvency requirements, especially under regulatory frameworks like Solvency UK.

Market Share Consolidation

Strengthening competitive positioning by acquiring competitors or exiting non-core segments to focus resources on areas of strategic advantage.

Technological Advancements

Acquiring insurtech capabilities or partnering to boost digital platforms, enhance customer experience, and leverage data analytics for better underwriting and service.

Regulatory Pressures

Adapting to evolving rules (e.g., FCA’s Consumer Duty, fair value assessments) which influence product design, pricing strategies, and operational efficiency.

Claims Inflation & Catastrophes

Responding to rising claims costs from general inflation and an increasing frequency of weather-related events, prompting insurers to seek scale or divest high-risk portfolios.

The interplay of these drivers leads to a more concentrated market, impacts product offerings, influences innovation dynamics, and shapes the overall strategic direction of the UK insurance industry.

Future Outlook: Navigating an Evolving Landscape

The UK household insurance market is set for continued transformation. Insurers must adapt to moderating premium growth, persistent climate risks, and the unceasing imperative for digital innovation to meet consumer expectations and regulatory demands.

Key Anticipated Trends

  • Potential moderation in premium growth rates through 2025 as inflationary pressures may ease.
  • Continued significant impact of extreme weather events on claims frequency and severity.
  • Growing consumer demand for comprehensive coverage, including emerging risks like cyber threats.
  • Increased adoption and integration of AI, advanced data analytics, and smart home technology by insurers.

Challenges & Opportunities

  • Balancing policy affordability for consumers with the need for profitability amid sustained cost pressures.
  • Meeting and evidencing compliance with evolving regulatory demands, particularly Consumer Duty and fair value.
  • Tapping into the considerable uninsured and underinsured household segments with tailored and accessible products.
  • Leveraging technology not just for efficiency, but for deeper customer personalization and proactive risk mitigation.
  • Enhancing end-to-end customer service and claims experiences to foster loyalty in a competitive market.

Agility, strategic foresight, and a relentless focus on customer-centricity will be paramount for insurers to thrive. Continuous innovation in products, distribution, operational processes, and technology adoption will be key differentiators in this dynamic environment.

© 2025 UK Insurance Market Insights. Infographic based on Ether Introductions and Deep Research Report Analysis.

Everything is in place and you are a well oiled department. What more can you achieve?

Linking it all together

Category plans are commodity driven. Negotiations are commodity driven. Management Information, audits and interim reviews are all commodity driven.

As a procurement and supply chain function it makes complete sense to adopt a silo approach.

However, within a claims function the primary consideration must be the customer and this requires a claims “eco-system”.

Using technology as an enabler we have created multiple claims eco systems in the past where each function is complimentary to the next. But it is more than just systems and processes. We create a culture of joint supplier sessions and data sharing to achieve true collaboration.


We create a collaborative culture of shared supplier journeys. Devising customer centric supplier deployment , coupled with technology and data we can create a supplier eco-system for you.

Competition

Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s), Service Level Agreements (SLAs) and service credits attached to their failure will go some way to providing an incentive for your suppliers to focus on performance. Some way.

To truly get the best out of your claims supply chain we believe that competition and rewards get the very best performance.

Static panels will inevitably deliver a static performance. Rewarding good delivery with more volume, better rates, more authority and quicker payment terms will get a competitive edge within your supply chain.


We have devised competitive modelling on a large number of claims categories to significant benefit both from a financial and service perspective.

Your function is in place and doing rather well. What’s next?

Category Planning

Part of the move from a reactionary supply chain function to a proactive one is the need to have a detailed category plan for all spends.

We have an in depth knowledge of insurance claims spend categories covering the key suppliers, market conditions and performance. Working with your key stakeholders we are able to provide these plans. Just as importantly, can execute them too.

A key element of any plan is a full and detailed data analysis. Not just the basic measures at this stage though. This requires a deeper dive to draw out fresh insights over cost control and performance.


Data drives everything we do, informed by years of experience. We have a deep understanding of what supplier data is telling us and the knowledge base to know how to best use it.

Systems

Running everything on spreadsheets and shared files only works for so long. We have worked on multiple vendor management platforms and e-bidding tools and been part of delivery programmes to implement them.

When they are implemented properly these platforms take the headache out of renewals and compliance. When implemented poorly everyone does everything they can to avoid the platforms so its key to get it right. Once we have received the financial data covering spend we are able to build a picture of what you are spending and where.


We have no links to any systems or platforms, nor any preferences. Each client will have different needs and levels of usage which will dictate the most appropriate systems to be employed.

We start with the basics. You cannot control your supplier spend if you don’t know what it is.

Follow the money.

Starting with your own financial records and known payees, we start to build up a picture of the likely spend.

We then cross referenced this against the suppliers own financial records. In this way, a true picture of the claims supplier spend is built up.

Working with your teams, we issue Raw data requests covering not just financials but key performance data and sub-spend detail. By way of an example, this might include the office location where the work was undertaken and the partner who actually did the work.

We then are able to build up a profile of what you are spending with what firms.


A lot of time and effort can be spent here trying to get the numbers to match 100%. Our best advice is to get to a matching rate of above 80% and stop.

Build a picture of your spend.

Once we have received the financial data covering spend we are able to build a picture of what you are spending and where.

We then discuss rates and negotiate client-specific rates rather than using the “walk-in” rates that suppliers typically apply without a formal agreement.

Other activity covered;

  • SLA’s established and agreed
  • MI requirements and frequency of reporting established
  • Draft contracts or terms of reference put in place

Our aim is to get you on the correct rates with management controls in place to ensure that the suppliers are adhering to best practice.

Simply put, we specialise in dealing with Insurance Claims Supply Chains. We have experience at all stages of a functions journey, from very beginning to highly evolved and add value at each level.

When working with Insurance Companies we typically find that there are five main stages of maturity of the claims supply chain. Each stage requires a different approach in order to maximise return on investment for the client.

That said, these stages and our approach is indicative of what activity is required and what the likely outcomes will be.

Each client is different, with unique requirements and expectations.

There is no generic approach, only the application of experience and expertise within insurance claims procurement.

  • No dedicated supply or insurance claims procurement staff
  • Total supplier spend not known
  • Rates sometimes recorded
  • No formal panel
  • Few if any signed contracts
  • Ad-hoc MI
  • Claims experts not vendor experts

  • Individuals allocated to vendor management as part of wider duties
  • Formal panel exists
  • Annual spend is known
  • Semi-regular MI received from vendors
  • Some contracts in place

  • Vendor management and bidding software utilised
  • Contract management automated
  • MI and data sets absorbed into central data base for analysis
  • Audit scores (performance, compliance and ESG) centralised and monitored
  • Extensive category plans in place

  • Claims supply chain “Eco-system” is all connected and automated
  • Real time data feed and analytics
  • Predictive tools in place to feed into pricing and other areas of the business
  • Surge resilience adaptability
  • Real time measurements of capacity and failure points
  • Performance based work allocation in real time

You only know what you know. No matter how mature your claims supply chain function might be, you can never been 100% sure that you are getting the best deal. We have multiple data sets that form part of our benchmarking analysis service. Contact us or book a meeting for more details.

Examples of our data sets


PROPERTY REPAIRS

Builders and surveyors

We have full data sets covering the fees incurred, the claims outcome (fulfilled, cashed, zero settlement) and the final indemnity spend for surveyors.

For building repairs we have regional indemnity averages, national indemnity averages and claims management fees comparisons.

Loss Adjusters

Domestic and Commercial

At our disposal is a full set of fee data covering various claims types at every value banding.

Of course fees are only one aspect of a loss adjusters output and we have adherence to fee scale data as well as the all important average indemnity controls.

Third Party Administrators

UK and USA

Covering UK, USA and some other territories, we have an extensive data set on TPA’s.

Fees, conversions to Loss Adjusters, indemnity controls and claims outcomes are all covered. We also have data on low value claims as well as more complex and specialist claims.

LEGAL RATES

Global

Over the years we have built up a comprehensive set of legal rates covering most territories around the globe.

These are split by individual hourly rates according to seniority, by type of matter, and by the location the services would be provided.

Overall claims performance

Loss ratios to target operating models

Multiple data points covering the key metrics which provide valuable insights into how an insurance book of business is performing.

Our insights cover loss ratios, elapsed days from FNOL to closure, reopening rates, claims outcomes, average and total indemnity spend.